If Justine’s narrative is fiction and O’Brien’s is memoir, then Aquino’s book is part Field Manual and part how-to guide to martial mind control techniques.
It’s edifying in its systematic candor, as an implementation and administration of Crowley-level sadism en masse. In terms of its textual lethality you might want to add it to your list of exhibits..
Please see Unbekoming’s substack post of March 20th, “The Master and His Emissary”…..Where the “positively demonic dynamism” is viewed through the lens of left brain dominance in denial of that aberration.
Very interesting. "Patients relying on the left hemisphere alone lose the ability to perceive living things as alive. Faces become masks. People become mechanisms. The animate world drains of vitality."
I like McGilchrist, and his thought-experiment is spot-on.
"Trauma-based mind control techniques, according to the authors, originated in research into multigenerational Satanist families conducted in Nazi Germany by the Schutzstaffel (SS), under the personal oversight of Heinrich Himmler."
I'd be REALLY surprised if this was true. It fits right in with every other wild accusation against the Third Reich that would rather apply to the accuser.
They weren't the worst guys, but they weren't exactly good guys either...
This pathology exists in every government AFAIKT.
We need to require functional MRI screenings for all politicians and gov't employees to identify the psychopaths (and if I was a corporate board member, I'd require it for any prospective CEO). It's the first time we've had this capability as a species.
I read the O’Brien/Phillips book a few years ago and Aquino’s book last year but hadn’t connected them to de Sade. Of course everyone’s connected now and probably have been for a long time..
There's no direct connection as far as I know, but I was intrigued by the idea of Justine and Cathy's experiences being fiction and non-fiction expressions of the same narrative archetypes. Was Aquino's book worth reading?
Tour de force. Thank you.
Do you have any particular books/researches that come to mind re. the French Revolution
as noted here?
No nothing specific, sorry. I'm referring to the fairly widespread notion that the Revolution was Masonic in origin.
If Justine’s narrative is fiction and O’Brien’s is memoir, then Aquino’s book is part Field Manual and part how-to guide to martial mind control techniques.
It’s edifying in its systematic candor, as an implementation and administration of Crowley-level sadism en masse. In terms of its textual lethality you might want to add it to your list of exhibits..
Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics (ISGP): https://isgp-studies.com/index
See: "Dutroux" for a more undeniable exposure of Cabal.
Please see Unbekoming’s substack post of March 20th, “The Master and His Emissary”…..Where the “positively demonic dynamism” is viewed through the lens of left brain dominance in denial of that aberration.
Very interesting. "Patients relying on the left hemisphere alone lose the ability to perceive living things as alive. Faces become masks. People become mechanisms. The animate world drains of vitality."
I like McGilchrist, and his thought-experiment is spot-on.
"Trauma-based mind control techniques, according to the authors, originated in research into multigenerational Satanist families conducted in Nazi Germany by the Schutzstaffel (SS), under the personal oversight of Heinrich Himmler."
I'd be REALLY surprised if this was true. It fits right in with every other wild accusation against the Third Reich that would rather apply to the accuser.
Maybe. But I believe it's factual that Operation Paperclip imported as many mind-scientists as rocket-scientists into the US.
They weren't the worst guys, but they weren't exactly good guys either...
This pathology exists in every government AFAIKT.
We need to require functional MRI screenings for all politicians and gov't employees to identify the psychopaths (and if I was a corporate board member, I'd require it for any prospective CEO). It's the first time we've had this capability as a species.
Although it's clear we didn't get the straight story on WWII, this pathology exists in all governments. Why would the 3rd Reich be any different?
I read the O’Brien/Phillips book a few years ago and Aquino’s book last year but hadn’t connected them to de Sade. Of course everyone’s connected now and probably have been for a long time..
There's no direct connection as far as I know, but I was intrigued by the idea of Justine and Cathy's experiences being fiction and non-fiction expressions of the same narrative archetypes. Was Aquino's book worth reading?
Nevermind, I've read on.