here we have yet another powerfully sensible, knock-out punch. **scratches head, watches tumbleweeds blow by** but how is it that nobody (apparently) is here reading this stuff? is it just you and me in this here ghost town? fkn hell!
"But first, we must fight this war against madness and mockery." therein lies the rub, eh?
"this war" you are referring to is not the conventional "us vs. them" kind, is it? rather it is the war within each of us, love of power vs. love of life, silently raging & ever-present in ones' own heart and soul. you know, the one that pretty much nobody dares to stand and fight lest they uncover the demons within that whisper deadly-sweet lies that allow our minds to forever imagine that we are kind, caring, sensible beings when the truth is that we are anything but.
"never try to teach a pig to sing. it wastes your time and annoys the pig.", as the saying goes. all we can really do is sing and hope to touch hearts. that is, those wandering souls out there that may be on the fence about it all and open to the task of seeking deeper heart-based truths as the madness of our times leaves in our mouths its' foul & bitter taste. your writings, as you know, are music to my ears. just like we play songs again and again to feel their magic, so do i read your words.
The real goal of the environmental movement is the destruction of capitalism and climate change is the tool - that is why facts and reason fall,on deaf ears since they hav no more weapons if you take away their CO2 weapon
Many a thank for this outstanding work! I am an archeologist and I wish every single one of my colleagues would recognise the importance of your text. In fact, for almost all so called scientific world this text should be the Gospel grade epiphany. Keep up with your research and evangelisation among heathens. God bless!
Pleasure! Look, I knew a lot about thic climate hoax & scam, and anout the sciences behind involved. Your post however has filled many lacunae I had prior to reading it. Hence my deepest respects to your labour (vox clamantis in deserto). Went ober to tour webpage - passionate stuff. Cant stop ploughing through… I’m enchanted with your penmanship.
Satanic joke indeed. Was it not Kerry who has been claiming something even more ludicrous - that we need to reduce farming, to eliminate large portions or swaths of it, in order to save the human race, and the planet?
Well yes, in their perverted minds, starving the people would indeed save the planet. But I'll go one step further. There are those that say they want so much more than a kind of self suicide. They desire nothing more than to court the abyss, to dance with a great void of nothing, to flip the bird metaphorically speaking of what they see as God's creation, who is such a bad God for making creation.
Powerful rhetoric, encapsulated amongst scientific insight, producing liberating, almost intoxicating breaths of Truth, amidst the stifling fog of war, produced by the devilish decriers of humanity.
Thank you so much! I'm very happy that people have responded so positively to this essay. Some with constructive corrections, too, which as a layman I need. I put a lot into the writing, and when I see a comment like this I feel my time was not wasted -- and thanks for the restacks, all in the cause!
It could not be wasted: because it so evidently shaped your mind and heat. It is evidently substantial and you have become a Messenger of Good News: “the climate change threat, highlighted endlessly by a supine media is based on an intentional scientific distortion.”
I hope you will keep the message alive and shape it profoundly, like a dagger to the heart of the Lie.
Do not underestimate there significance of the Message or yourself, the Messenger: the world needs both!
Brilliant article that I’ve shared with my family some who are believers but others and friends who believe the repetitive narrative “ it’s climate change”
Congratulations for a very well written article. I hope it will somehow find the widest distribution possible. Perhaps our new federal administration will direct funding agencies to pay more attention to the fundamental science and less attention to progressive politics. The science journals will remain a problem.
While agree with you about the futility and destructiveness of vilifying carbon, having already seen many deleterious social effects, ie people’s belief in carbon’s (and now, cows’?) inherent evil.
It’s an absurd dodge to keep people from realizing the importance of trees and healthy forests, in acting, with ocean plankton, as the lungs of our planet, because extract, build, destroy and pollute are the governing goals of modern industry, net zero or otherwise.
However, that being said, all these mathematical gyrations to prove the existence of god are so boring. What’s the point of spreading belief in god, purportedly to drive a movement to oppose the destruction of our biosphere, when it’s things like the bible passage that gave men dominion over the earth, which have led to it being fashionable to destroy as much of god’s supposed creation in order to better serve that god?
More central to that is the Douglas Adams’ analogy to a puddle of water, in which the puddle says something like, oh isn’t this hole I’m in grand, as it’s perfectly made for my exact shape?
Hi, and thanks for commenting. I'm fine with the question because it gives me the chance to denoise the signal, if I can put it like that. I was an atheist for most of my life -- or I thought I was, but looking back I understand that I was always searching for the sublime, but doing it through Romanticism and Bohemianism.
Now I would say that I'm a scientific convert, although I'm not scientist, for me the process starting with Eric Dollard, Nikola Tesla and Kristian Birkeland and leading to the Electric Universe and plasma cosmology and back to Heraclitus and the Stoics -- and I remember the moment when my sense of wonder turned into awareness of the elegance and power of the systems that give rise to everything, and of the impossibility of it all being either accidental or meaningless, as my culture had taught me. So my personal history is a good example of 'anatheism' -- the return to God -- and Hoyle is another. Hoyle didn't revert to the God of the Bible, and nor have I. I resonate with Baudrillard's aphorism that 'Religions emerge from the Death of God.' Anatheism as I am experiencing it is not about accepting any doctrine; it's the raw intuition of an intelligence behind everything, of the universe being alive, more like a mind than a machine -- beyond that, it's a syncretic process of thinking and feeling your way to a personal conception of God and a reassessment of everything. That's what happened to Hoyle -- he wasn't trying to prove God or intelligent design -- he was a resolved atheist. The math didn't 'gyrate', it jumped out and smacked him right in the face.
It's a fantastic example of what the Greeks called 'katalepsis' (and we call an epiphany). If all perceptions are acataleptic -- ie impressions (phantasiai) which may be true or false, then katalepsis is something stronger than the weak English translation 'comprehension' -- though even that debased term contains the 'grasping' root -- something more like our usage of 'epiphany', denoting the moment of contact with the truth, the noumenon behind the phenomenon.
There's a lot more I'd like to say about gyrations and puddles and boredom but this is turning into an essay, so I'll maybe come back to it later. Thanks for reading and commenting, really.
That was some heavy reading for a retired guy that never even graduated high school. Other than the science behind this read, which is beyond me, I’ve been firmly grounded and seen the bs behind climate change. I was however taken aback at just how serious this situation is, terrifying actually.
What is the reason they are adding these micro particles to jet fuel? You imply that they are doing it to increase the albedo effect and/or to enable over the horizon radar. Does it have nothing to do with improving the performance of jet fuel? And, if not, who decided to do this?
The US military industrial complex, Boeing, Lockheed, RTX etc. Some of these metals might have performance-enhancing effects, I don't know. Jim Lee at ClimateViewer would be able to answer that kind of question... or Clifford Carnicom, the independent scientist who has studied the fall-out for many years (and now works with Dr Ana Mihalcea by the way) [CarnicomInstitute.Org]. I wrote some short articles about this a few years ago which I can share if you want me to... if you're looking for methodical investigation and careful epistemology by professionals using official data, then the cases of the late Rosalind Peterson (an agricultural loss adjustor) or Kristen Meghan (an industrial hygienist/environmental impacts specialist in the US Airforce) might interest you. https://thelethaltext.me/2017/06/13/meghan/https://thelethaltext.me/2017/06/13/peterson/https://thelethaltext.me/2019/05/19/cloverleaf/ David these are old articles which I want to rework and before sharing them to Substack, but at least they're short and to the point, so feel free to read and please share your thoughts!
Sorry for doing that to you. And thanks for the question -- it's kicked me into think I need to publish something on this on Substack as a follow up to the Carbon Epiphany.
Yes this chemtrails item is news and it seems important. How much does it alter our world and is it on balance helpful or harmful? Please elucidate. While I’m at it, the suggestion at the end of your wonderful and beautifully written article that we end the use of oil based plastics in favor of hemp comes out of “left” field and could use some amplification as well.
Carbon is the element of life itself. It’s no coincidence that the dark — even demonic — forces controlling much of our civilization today go to such lengths to defame and lie about this aspect of reality. The deeper any country has sunk into the Culture of Death, the more vehement the attacks on carbon.
Yeah about the tumbleweeds I guess I'm just no good at cultivating attention except sometimes from the wrong people -- thus the shadow banning on other platforms. Then again I was never angling for a mass audience. I appreciate the readers I have.
hey Paul! = ^]
here we have yet another powerfully sensible, knock-out punch. **scratches head, watches tumbleweeds blow by** but how is it that nobody (apparently) is here reading this stuff? is it just you and me in this here ghost town? fkn hell!
"But first, we must fight this war against madness and mockery." therein lies the rub, eh?
"this war" you are referring to is not the conventional "us vs. them" kind, is it? rather it is the war within each of us, love of power vs. love of life, silently raging & ever-present in ones' own heart and soul. you know, the one that pretty much nobody dares to stand and fight lest they uncover the demons within that whisper deadly-sweet lies that allow our minds to forever imagine that we are kind, caring, sensible beings when the truth is that we are anything but.
"never try to teach a pig to sing. it wastes your time and annoys the pig.", as the saying goes. all we can really do is sing and hope to touch hearts. that is, those wandering souls out there that may be on the fence about it all and open to the task of seeking deeper heart-based truths as the madness of our times leaves in our mouths its' foul & bitter taste. your writings, as you know, are music to my ears. just like we play songs again and again to feel their magic, so do i read your words.
The real goal of the environmental movement is the destruction of capitalism and climate change is the tool - that is why facts and reason fall,on deaf ears since they hav no more weapons if you take away their CO2 weapon
Many a thank for this outstanding work! I am an archeologist and I wish every single one of my colleagues would recognise the importance of your text. In fact, for almost all so called scientific world this text should be the Gospel grade epiphany. Keep up with your research and evangelisation among heathens. God bless!
Thank you for this -- a little encouragement goes a long way, so thank you. 'Evangelism among the heathens' -- nice!
Pleasure! Look, I knew a lot about thic climate hoax & scam, and anout the sciences behind involved. Your post however has filled many lacunae I had prior to reading it. Hence my deepest respects to your labour (vox clamantis in deserto). Went ober to tour webpage - passionate stuff. Cant stop ploughing through… I’m enchanted with your penmanship.
99% perspiration I can assure you. I keep discovering new things, every one another nail in the coffin.
Quite. No more is usually needed in fact 😜
Woow! What amazing wonderful work! Certainly I shall share this!
Satanic joke indeed. Was it not Kerry who has been claiming something even more ludicrous - that we need to reduce farming, to eliminate large portions or swaths of it, in order to save the human race, and the planet?
Well yes, in their perverted minds, starving the people would indeed save the planet. But I'll go one step further. There are those that say they want so much more than a kind of self suicide. They desire nothing more than to court the abyss, to dance with a great void of nothing, to flip the bird metaphorically speaking of what they see as God's creation, who is such a bad God for making creation.
They hate life itself.
Well said.
Powerful rhetoric, encapsulated amongst scientific insight, producing liberating, almost intoxicating breaths of Truth, amidst the stifling fog of war, produced by the devilish decriers of humanity.
I have re-stacked multiple significant quotes!
Thank you so much! I'm very happy that people have responded so positively to this essay. Some with constructive corrections, too, which as a layman I need. I put a lot into the writing, and when I see a comment like this I feel my time was not wasted -- and thanks for the restacks, all in the cause!
It could not be wasted: because it so evidently shaped your mind and heat. It is evidently substantial and you have become a Messenger of Good News: “the climate change threat, highlighted endlessly by a supine media is based on an intentional scientific distortion.”
I hope you will keep the message alive and shape it profoundly, like a dagger to the heart of the Lie.
Do not underestimate there significance of the Message or yourself, the Messenger: the world needs both!
Brilliant article that I’ve shared with my family some who are believers but others and friends who believe the repetitive narrative “ it’s climate change”
Great, thanks for putting it to good use.
Congratulations for a very well written article. I hope it will somehow find the widest distribution possible. Perhaps our new federal administration will direct funding agencies to pay more attention to the fundamental science and less attention to progressive politics. The science journals will remain a problem.
While agree with you about the futility and destructiveness of vilifying carbon, having already seen many deleterious social effects, ie people’s belief in carbon’s (and now, cows’?) inherent evil.
It’s an absurd dodge to keep people from realizing the importance of trees and healthy forests, in acting, with ocean plankton, as the lungs of our planet, because extract, build, destroy and pollute are the governing goals of modern industry, net zero or otherwise.
However, that being said, all these mathematical gyrations to prove the existence of god are so boring. What’s the point of spreading belief in god, purportedly to drive a movement to oppose the destruction of our biosphere, when it’s things like the bible passage that gave men dominion over the earth, which have led to it being fashionable to destroy as much of god’s supposed creation in order to better serve that god?
More central to that is the Douglas Adams’ analogy to a puddle of water, in which the puddle says something like, oh isn’t this hole I’m in grand, as it’s perfectly made for my exact shape?
Hi, and thanks for commenting. I'm fine with the question because it gives me the chance to denoise the signal, if I can put it like that. I was an atheist for most of my life -- or I thought I was, but looking back I understand that I was always searching for the sublime, but doing it through Romanticism and Bohemianism.
Now I would say that I'm a scientific convert, although I'm not scientist, for me the process starting with Eric Dollard, Nikola Tesla and Kristian Birkeland and leading to the Electric Universe and plasma cosmology and back to Heraclitus and the Stoics -- and I remember the moment when my sense of wonder turned into awareness of the elegance and power of the systems that give rise to everything, and of the impossibility of it all being either accidental or meaningless, as my culture had taught me. So my personal history is a good example of 'anatheism' -- the return to God -- and Hoyle is another. Hoyle didn't revert to the God of the Bible, and nor have I. I resonate with Baudrillard's aphorism that 'Religions emerge from the Death of God.' Anatheism as I am experiencing it is not about accepting any doctrine; it's the raw intuition of an intelligence behind everything, of the universe being alive, more like a mind than a machine -- beyond that, it's a syncretic process of thinking and feeling your way to a personal conception of God and a reassessment of everything. That's what happened to Hoyle -- he wasn't trying to prove God or intelligent design -- he was a resolved atheist. The math didn't 'gyrate', it jumped out and smacked him right in the face.
It's a fantastic example of what the Greeks called 'katalepsis' (and we call an epiphany). If all perceptions are acataleptic -- ie impressions (phantasiai) which may be true or false, then katalepsis is something stronger than the weak English translation 'comprehension' -- though even that debased term contains the 'grasping' root -- something more like our usage of 'epiphany', denoting the moment of contact with the truth, the noumenon behind the phenomenon.
There's a lot more I'd like to say about gyrations and puddles and boredom but this is turning into an essay, so I'll maybe come back to it later. Thanks for reading and commenting, really.
Your comment is juvenile.
That was some heavy reading for a retired guy that never even graduated high school. Other than the science behind this read, which is beyond me, I’ve been firmly grounded and seen the bs behind climate change. I was however taken aback at just how serious this situation is, terrifying actually.
To be a Marxist is to be self-loathing.
And one cannot be more self-loathing than a hater of carbon.
What is the reason they are adding these micro particles to jet fuel? You imply that they are doing it to increase the albedo effect and/or to enable over the horizon radar. Does it have nothing to do with improving the performance of jet fuel? And, if not, who decided to do this?
The US military industrial complex, Boeing, Lockheed, RTX etc. Some of these metals might have performance-enhancing effects, I don't know. Jim Lee at ClimateViewer would be able to answer that kind of question... or Clifford Carnicom, the independent scientist who has studied the fall-out for many years (and now works with Dr Ana Mihalcea by the way) [CarnicomInstitute.Org]. I wrote some short articles about this a few years ago which I can share if you want me to... if you're looking for methodical investigation and careful epistemology by professionals using official data, then the cases of the late Rosalind Peterson (an agricultural loss adjustor) or Kristen Meghan (an industrial hygienist/environmental impacts specialist in the US Airforce) might interest you. https://thelethaltext.me/2017/06/13/meghan/ https://thelethaltext.me/2017/06/13/peterson/ https://thelethaltext.me/2019/05/19/cloverleaf/ David these are old articles which I want to rework and before sharing them to Substack, but at least they're short and to the point, so feel free to read and please share your thoughts!
Oh gawd (I read all three of your articles) and there was I happily believing the whole chemtrails thing was just paranoia. Still seems unbelievable.
Sorry for doing that to you. And thanks for the question -- it's kicked me into think I need to publish something on this on Substack as a follow up to the Carbon Epiphany.
Yes this chemtrails item is news and it seems important. How much does it alter our world and is it on balance helpful or harmful? Please elucidate. While I’m at it, the suggestion at the end of your wonderful and beautifully written article that we end the use of oil based plastics in favor of hemp comes out of “left” field and could use some amplification as well.
I understand that hemp-derived plastics are just as good, the difference being that they are biodegradable. As for the bigger questions about chemtrails, I do have an article on the subject: https://thelethaltext.substack.com/p/cloverleaf -- or better, you could watch Sofia Smallstorm's excellent presentation: https://rumble.com/v66c9ud-from-chemtrails-to-pseudo-life-the-dark-agenda-of-synthetic-biology-sofia-s.html.
Carbon is the element of life itself. It’s no coincidence that the dark — even demonic — forces controlling much of our civilization today go to such lengths to defame and lie about this aspect of reality. The deeper any country has sunk into the Culture of Death, the more vehement the attacks on carbon.
You put it well. Look at UK, Ireland...
Superb work! So heartening to see someone intelligently fighting back against the ‘climate change’ lies. Thank you 🙏🏻
Well there is a few years worth of food for thought, thank you very much for this.
A fantastic and comprehensive article.
Thanks
Outstanding and your insistence on reality over stories matches mine. You may enjoy my latest attempt at suggesting my simple notion.
https://open.substack.com/pub/beyondcertainty/p/never-pretend-to-know-what-you-dont
Yeah about the tumbleweeds I guess I'm just no good at cultivating attention except sometimes from the wrong people -- thus the shadow banning on other platforms. Then again I was never angling for a mass audience. I appreciate the readers I have.